|
Pauline Theology
This is a description of the main differences between the theology of Paul and that of Jesus. The theology of Paul is in opposition to people loving their neighbour as themselves. This chapter is designed to highlight a major problem with the Church and general Christian theology. Jesus was opposed to the stifling effect of traditions, and his ministry focused on the disadvantaged and outcasts to society. By contrast, Paul's letters misrepresent the teachings of Jesus in such a way as to encourage people to place emphasis on things that do not help others. Pauline theology is harmful to its followers because it is very restrictive to individual freedom. It is harmful to those that Jesus came to teach about (e.g. the poor and outcasts to society) because Paul draws a false interpretation of the second commandment of Jesus (he says that it summarises the whole of Jewish Law) and uses the concept of grace to water down the teachings of Jesus. The Church does have a positive effect on the poor, but this effect is severely hampered by Pauline theology. The problems of poverty, inequality and suffering could be solved through loving our neighbours as ourselves, but I do not believe that they will ever be solved by the Church. I have been in several churches, and they are environments in which I am not comfortable. I have found that some churchgoers also find going to church difficult, but they regard it as their duty to do so. Paul advocates payment for priests:
Jesus does not advocate that his followers need to be paid a regular wage. He suggests that we should give up what we have and follow him. While I appreciate that some jobs can contribute to the suffering to other people, I also appreciate that many people have families to support. Giving up your job to love your neighbour as yourself is only really possible if you have support from other people. However, I feel that priests are being paid to teach people to follow the religion defined by St. Paul. It would be much more useful if there were people to teach the benefits of loving your neighbour as yourself. If they did so, those who they teach could support their activities on the basis of loving their neighbour as themselves. I suggest that they could be supported by people in their personal heaven rather than being paid a wage by a church institution. This is the way that Jesus taught his disciples to support themselves, to stay in a house and teach people in the surrounding area about him. I believe that a similar type of teaching activity could be extremely useful and would be worth supporting. In my opinion, the best way to show people the benefits of loving their neighbour as themselves is by serving them. It was Paul and not Jesus who set up the Church. All of the rules about churches are in Paul's letters. Paul was not an eyewitness of Jesus – he says that he heard a voice, and his letters are the result of the teachings that he received from the voice. In addition, there were unusual miracles performed through Paul (his used handkerchiefs made people better). I suggest that Paul's teachings are derived from a negative spiritual interaction, which supported his teachings with spiritual occurrences and continues to do so in modern churches. Paul was not the only person who thought that a disembodied voice was a positive spiritual force or Holy Spirit. For example, in Acts chapter 2, the voices of the disciples are claimed to have been translated into the native languages of their listeners by a disembodied voice. In addition, a disembodied voice claiming to be God is described in the Old Testament, and often encouraged people to kill each other and go to war. Some churchgoers claim to have a personal relationship with God through a disembodied voice. Unfortunately, many people who have no experience of spiritual occurrences dismiss them as psychological illnesses, meaning that this spiritual entity is free to continue exacting the maximum amount of individual suffering. It is possible that the hypothetical document (Q) used by the Gospel writers is another example of this voice, and would explain the presence of inaccurate teachings in the Gospels. I believe that God represents an extremely intelligent spiritual force that promotes the maximum suffering of all individuals. Here are some examples: Moses, Leviticus 24:13-14: The Lord said to Moses, "Take that man out of the camp. Everyone who heard him curse shall put his hands on the man's head to testify that he is guilty, and then the whole community shall stone him to death." Paul, 1 Corinthians 5:4-5: "As you meet together, and I meet with you in my spirit, by the power of our Lord Jesus present with us, you are to hand this man over to Satan for his body to be destroyed, so that his spirit may be saved in the Day of the Lord." Muhammad, The Cow (2:191): "Kill them wherever you encounter them, and drive them out from where they drove you out, for persecution is more serious than killing." Compare these to Jesus: Jesus, John 8:7: As they stood there asking him questions, he straightened himself up and said to them, "Whichever one of you has committed no sin may throw the first stone at her." There is a clear contradiction between what the Old Testament god told Moses to do (stone someone to death) and what Jesus taught people to do. I find no useful purpose for the Old Testament; it instructs people to kill others on many occasions. It is very different from the idea of loving your neighbour as yourself. Christian theology is very concerned about the concept of 'false teaching' (it could be described as anything that contradicts with Pauline theology). I define false teaching to be anything that causes suffering if people choose to follow it. Using this definition, it is possible to show that the teachings of Paul are false because they tell us how to live in such a way that people are discouraged from loving their neighbour as themselves. I also classify some teaching to be irrelevant; i.e. that which doesn't teach anything at all. In my opinion, Paul's letter to Philemon comes under this category. Another type of teaching defined in Judeo-Christian theology is the interpretation of religious texts and spiritual communication. I do not accept that any such interpretations are of benefit to anyone, because my experience and research has shown that spiritual interactions are harmful, even though they may appear to be harmless or even beneficial. Teaching that promotes suffering can be very subtle – it can consist of omissions of important things, incorrect emphasis of less important things, inventing religious terminology that has no real meaning or is misleading, essentially anything that encourages people not to love their neighbour as themselves. One example is Paul's concept of grace: Grace (definition according to Pauline theology): (1) God sent Jesus to die. (2) His sacrifice removes your sin. (3) It's a free gift; you don't have to do anything about it except believe that this message is true, because he died on the cross and rose from the dead. If you believe in life after death, then something similar to the concept of grace must apply to all people regardless of their beliefs. For us to desire any other outcome would not be loving our neighbour as ourselves. However, I believe that it is wrong to use the concept of grace to water down the idea of loving our neighbour as ourselves, because this idea defines an optimal life strategy that is directed towards reducing suffering. Here is an example of Paul's false teaching:
"As in all the churches of God's people, 34 the women should keep quiet in the meetings. They are not allowed to speak; as the Jewish Law says, they must not be in charge. 35 If they want to find out about something, they should ask their husbands at home. It is a disgraceful thing for a woman to speak in church. 36 Or could it be that the word of God came from you? Or are you the only ones to whom it came? 37 If anyone supposes he is God's messenger or has a spiritual gift, he must realize that what I am writing to you is the Lord's command. 38 But if he does not pay attention to this, pay no attention to him." Here is another example of a teaching from Paul that is false. Paul treats Jesus as an idol of forgiveness – a replacement for animal sacrifices. This is his 'grace' according to Paul which is defined above. For example:
How We are Put Right with God 21 But now God's way of putting people right with himself has been revealed. It has nothing to do with law, even though the Law of Moses and the prophets gave their witness to it. 22 God puts people right through their faith in Jesus Christ. God does this to all who believe in Christ, because there is no difference at all: everyone has sinned and is far away from God's saving presence. 24 But by the free gift of God's grace all are put right with him through Christ Jesus, who sets them free. 25-26 God offered him, so that by his blood he should become the means by which people's sins are forgiven through their faith in him. God did this in order to demonstrate that he is righteous. In the past he was patient and overlooked people's sins; but in the present time he deals with their sins, in order to demonstrate his righteousness. In this way God shows that he himself is righteous and that he puts right everyone who believes in Jesus.
Romans 6:5-10
Romans 8:31-35
Paul's false teaching is extremely difficult to identify because:
Paul's letters consist mostly of:
His phrases and keywords are misleading and many are not explained properly, for example:
It is a well known fact that interpersonal communication is only about 8% content – the rest comes from delivery, confidence, body language, intonation and emphasis. As long as someone like Paul looked convincing then people would accept whatever he said, particularly as miracles were claimed to be performed through him. In turn, his teachings led to many other people who know how to say the right keywords in the right way to sound convincing. Thus, the Christian religion became based upon a series of key phrases rather than on substance and understanding, resulting in a rule/tradition based system rather than a group of people loving their neighbours as themselves. Philemon – the one book that is very obviously of no use to us From Paul, a prisoner for the sake of Christ Jesus, and from our brother Timothy – To our friend and fellow-worker Philemon, and the church that meets in your house, and our sister Apphia, and our fellow-soldier Archippus: May God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ give you grace and peace. [Dear Philemon...] Brother Philemon, every time I pray, I mention you and give thanks to my God. For I hear of your love for all God's people and the faith you have in the Lord Jesus. My prayer is that our fellowship with you as believers will bring about a deeper understanding of every blessing which we have in our life in union with Christ. Your love, dear brother, has brought me great joy and much encouragement! You have cheered the hearts of all God's people. [I like you, Philemon] For this reason I could be bold enough, as your brother in Christ, to order you to do what should be done. But because I love you, I make a request instead. I do this even though I am Paul, the ambassador of Christ Jesus, and at present also a prisoner for his sake. So I make a request to you on behalf of Onesimus, who is my own son in Christ; for while in prison I have become his spiritual father. At one time he was of no use to you, but now he is useful. The Greek name Onesimus means "useful" both to you and to me. [There's a man, called Onesimus...] I am sending him back to you now, and with him goes my heart. I would like to keep him here with me, while I am in prison for the gospel's sake, so that he could help me in your place. However, I do not want to force you to help me; rather, I would like you to do it of your own free will. So I will not do anything unless you agree. It may be that Onesimus was away from you for a short time so that you might have him back for all time. And now he is not just a slave, but much more than a slave: he is a dear brother in Christ. How much he means to me! And how much more he will mean to you, both as a slave and as a brother in the Lord! [...and I'm sending him to you, into slavery] So, if you think of me as your partner, welcome him back just as you would welcome me. If he has done you any wrong or owes you anything, charge it to my account. Here, I will write this with my own hand: I, Paul, will pay you back. (I should not have to remind you, of course, that you owe your very self to me.) So, my brother, please do me this favour for the Lord's sake; as a brother in Christ, cheer me up! I am sure, as I write this, that you will do what I ask – in fact I know that you will do even more. At the same time, get a room ready for me, because I hope that God will answer the prayers of all of you and give me back to you. [do you have a spare room?] Epaphras, who is in prison with me for the sake of Christ Jesus, sends you his greetings, and so do my fellow-workers Mark, Aristarchus, Demas, and Luke. May the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. [Bye for now, Paul] Perhaps the only thing that can be gained from this letter is to note Paul's eagerness to send a free man back into slavery. Paul also tries to dominate Philemon by using his status as "the ambassador of Christ Jesus" and the claim that Philemon "owes himself" to Paul (i.e. his soul and afterlife). He also invites himself to stay at Philemon's house. Romans is the 'Gold Standard' of Paul's teaching. This letter is summarised below:
Many parts of this letter are irrelevant to us and can be ignored, namely his greetings and planned trips (about three chapters of text). Much of his letter is rhetoric (text with little meaning or importance) such as his discussions about Jews and Christians. In fact, his letters are a difficult read, mostly because one has to wade through a lot of text to get to a meaning that could be written much more concisely. Paul's main emphases in Romans are:
Romans 3:7-8: "But what if my untruth serves God's glory by making his truth stand out more clearly? Why should I still be condemned as a sinner? Why not say, then, 'Let us do evil so that good may come?' Some people, indeed, have insulted me by accusing me of saying this very thing! They will be condemned, as they should be." Paul sets himself up as 'The Authority' on God, and says that anyone who questions his teaching will be condemned. Paul has two large sections on 'not judging' in Romans. Essentially he is giving himself the authority to write whatever he wants by discouraging others from judging his letters. His letters were the earliest Christian writings, and therefore had influence over many other people, even those who were eyewitnesses of Jesus. He continually asserts that he is a chosen apostle of Jesus, but his vision on the road to Damascus clearly came from another source along with the voices that he hears and the 'tongues' that he speaks. Paul wrote thirteen epistles in total. In his other epistles, a major emphasis is the setting up of church traditions. Paul was the source of the Church and the inclusion of his letters in the New Testament made the matter fixed. Jesus said nothing about church traditions; he condemned the Pharisees for this very thing. One thing that should strike you when you start reading Romans is this. In 1:18-32, Paul says how bad everyone is, condemning them for their immorality and so on. Then just afterwards in 2:1 he says, "Do you, my friend, pass judgement on others?" He spends half a chapter judging others, then condemns others for judging. Most of the judging he does is for sexual immorality, yet Jesus doesn't seem especially bothered about this issue, given his friendship with Mary Magdalene. Jesus also says that the prostitutes and tax collectors are going to heaven ahead of the people he was teaching (Matthew 21:28-32). The teachings of Jesus are focused on helping the poor and outcasts to society. Another thing that stands out is this paragraph:
18 I know that good does not live in me – that is, in my human nature. For even though the desire to do good is in me, I am not able to do it. 19 I don't do the good I want to do; instead, I do the evil that I do not want to do. 20 If I do what I don't want to do, this means that I am no longer the one who does it; instead, it is the sin that lives in me.
1 Have the Jews then any advantage over the Gentiles? Or is there any value in being circumcised? 2 Much, indeed, in every way! In the first place, God trusted his message to the Jews. 3 But what if some of them were not faithful? Does this mean that God will not be faithful? 4 Certainly not! God must be true, even though every human being is a liar. As the scripture says, "You must be shown to be right when you speak; you must win your case when you are being tried."
I use everyday language because of the weakness of your natural selves.
So then, everything depends, not on what human beings want or do, but only on God's mercy.
1 Everyone must obey the state authorities, because no authority exists without God's permission, and the existing authorities have been put there by God. 2 Whoever opposes the existing authority opposes what God has ordered; and anyone who does so will bring judgement on himself. 3 For rulers are not to be feared by those who do good, but by those who do evil. Would you like to be unafraid of those in authority? Then do what is good, and they will praise you, 4 because they are God's servants working for your own good. But if you do evil, then be afraid of them, because their power to punish is real. They are God's servants and carry out God's punishment on those who do evil. 5 For this reason you must obey the authorities – not just because of God's punishment, but also as a matter of conscience. 6 That is also why you pay taxes, because the authorities are working for God when they fulfill their duties. Pay, then, what you owe them; pay them your personal and property taxes, and show respect and honour for them all.
Everyone has heard of your loyalty to the gospel, and for this reason I am happy about you. I want you to be wise about what is good, but innocent in what is evil. 1 Corinthians The Corinthians are claimed to be a mirror of the modern day Church. They had a strong economy, idols, a fractured church and 'immorality'. Paul sent them a letter to address these issues. I'm going to summarise it like I did with his letter to the Romans. This time I have annotated it so that the things that are incorrect or against Jesus are in bold, things of no relevance are underlined, and in normal text are the things that are less contentious, and the things that people could argue about (this includes instances where Paul may have influenced the Gospel writers; he was a companion of both Luke and Mark as mentioned in 2 Timothy 4:11). Again, the poor are not mentioned in this letter.
Here are some verses from 1 Corinthians that stand out:
As in the previous analysis, the things that are irrelevant are underlined and the things that are wrong are in bold.
2:10-11: "I do it in Christ's presence because of you, in order to keep Satan from getting the upper hand of us; for we all know what his plans are." Paul says things like this without explaining them. If he had said something like, "Satan (God) plans to put someone in the group of apostles as a false teacher to deflect their attention from loving their neighbour as themselves," then we would have been much clearer on what his plans were. 3:16: "His veil was removed when he turned to the Lord" – Paul does nothing to remove a metaphorical veil. In fact, he puts a veil over the teachings of Jesus and substitutes them with endless waffle. He invents many phrases to do with the Spirit and Christ, and many of these phrases have no real meaning. For example, 2 Corinthians 3:14-18: "Their minds, indeed, were closed; and to this very day their minds are covered with the same veil as they read the books of the old covenant. The veil is removed only when a person is joined to Christ. Even today, whenever they read the Law of Moses, the veil still covers their minds. But it can be removed, as the scripture says about Moses: "His veil was removed when he turned to the Lord." Now, "the Lord" in this passage is the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is present, there is freedom. All of us, then, reflect the glory of the Lord with uncovered faces; and that same glory, coming from the Lord, who is the Spirit, transforms us into his likeness in an ever greater degree of glory." Here's a break down of what he says: Closed minded people don't understand things properly (he complements the reader for their great understanding of his waffle). You only understand when you are "joined to Christ". Paul defines the Lord as being the Spirit, which he then does not go on to talk about. In other words, according to Paul we must be "joined" to something that is invisible and poorly defined in his letters (see 1 Corinthians 12:1-11). When we achieve this state, Paul claims that we are free and the Spirit will go on to transform us into the likeness of Jesus. If there really were a positive spiritual force in the Universe, we would have been made aware of the idea of a personal heaven a long time ago, and it would have received spiritual encouragement. In fact, spiritual encouragement is given to theologies that promote suffering and restrict freedom. Paul creates rules and encourages people to enforce them with punishment in 10:6. Paul justifies himself:
1:8: "If we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel that is different from the one we preached to you, may he be condemned to hell!" Verse 1:12 is an important point: "I did not receive it [the Gospel] from any human being, nor did anyone teach it to me. It was Jesus Christ himself who revealed it to me." He was with a group of eyewitnesses of Jesus, and he did not listen to any of them. The Gospels had not been written at the time, so he may have received all of his teachings from the disembodied voice that he claimed to hear. 2:21: "But if a person is put right through the Law, it means that Christ died for nothing!" Jesus did not die for nothing, but Pauline theology reduces the effectiveness of his teachings. 3:1: "You foolish Galatians! Who put a spell on you? Before your very eyes you had a clear description of the death of Jesus Christ on the cross!" Paul implies that just a description of a death is sufficient understanding of Jesus. He comes across as being obsessive about the death of Jesus and barely mentions his teachings or his life.
But a go-between is not needed when only one person is involved.
For what our human nature wants is opposed to what the Spirit wants, and what the Spirit wants is opposed to what our human nature wants. These two are enemies, and this means that you cannot do what you want to do. Paul justifies himself:
Ephesians
Let us praise God for his glorious grace, for the free gift he gave us in his dear Son! For by the blood of Christ we are set free, that is, our sins are forgiven. How great is the grace of God, which he gave to us in such large measure!
For it is by God's grace that you have been saved through faith. It is not the result of your own efforts, but God's gift, so that no one can boast about it.
God revealed his secret plan and made it known to me. (I have written briefly about this, and if you will read what I have written, you can learn about my understanding of the secret of Christ).
Those who used to rob must stop robbing and start working, in order to earn an honest living for themselves and to be able to help the poor.
Here is a summary of the letter to the Philippians:
Keep on imitating me, my brothers and sisters. Pay attention to those who follow the right example that we have set for you. In my opinion, imitating Paul leads to restricted freedom and a life teaching others information that does not help to decrease their suffering. Converting others to the same path reduces the freedom of others, and can propagate suffering.
All I want is to know Christ and to experience the power of his resurrection, to share in his sufferings and become like him in his death, in the hope that I myself will be raised from death to life.
Again, Paul justifies himself:
Colossians
2:4: "Do not let anyone deceive you with false arguments no matter how good they seem to be." The things that are highlighted in bold are in opposition to the teachings of Jesus. 1 Thessalonians
2 Thessalonians
1 Timothy
2 Timothy
Although Hebrews is not a Pauline letter, the author is equally against the theology of Jesus.
In the letters of the apostles, emphasis is placed on the importance of prayer, belief in Jesus as a replacement for animal sacrifices (this would have been a big change from Judaism), concerns about immorality, false teachers and patiently waiting for the end to come. The apostles believed that the end would be very soon (e.g. 1 John 2:18), which perhaps encouraged them to think that they did not need to do very much because the end would come quickly and sort everything out. However, 2000 years later, we are still awaiting an end to our selfish society. Such an end would have to come from people taking the decision to love their neighbour as themselves. I do not believe the prophecies in the Bible that relate to a time of the end or a day of judgement, as they are all derived from voices and visions. The apostles lived in a society that was relatively poor. They would not have been able to conceive of modern day inequality, so they did not place emphasis on helping the poor. The authors of these letters probably did not expect them to become scripture and were not writing to people 2000 years in the future. The Gospels were not written at first and many people would not have been able to read, so early Christians had to rely on memory and word of mouth for teachings about Jesus. This may have been distorted by Pauline theology and a disembodied voice (which they believed to be the Holy Spirit). Given the confusion surrounding Jewish theology, Pauline theology, spiritual interactions, a lack of education and extreme poverty, it is unsurprising that the teaching from the apostles does not reflect a pure form of loving your neighbour as yourself. I have rated Pauline Christianity as fulfilling the needs of others to a greater extent than average due to voluntary work and charitable giving arising from the second commandment of Jesus. However, Christians in Western society usually contribute to suffering (through methods such as consumerism) just like everyone else. The suffering that they cause can outweigh the benefits of any charitable giving, which may explain why the problems of poverty remain despite the huge number of Christians in the richest countries. Paul's teachings are claimed to be derived from spiritual interactions rather than Jesus or eyewitnesses, and he used his influence to distort the teachings of Jesus and establish a tradition-based church system. Later, his epistles were collected into the New Testament as scripture, competing with the teachings of Jesus in modern times. They present an alternative to loving your neighbour as yourself, and people accept this alternative because the teachings of Jesus are perceived to be too difficult. In fact, Jesus' vision of people loving their each other as themselves is achievable, but only for people who are prepared to reject the teachings of Paul.
![]()
|